Briefs: Ecclesiastical Law, Jurisdiction and Privilege

  • 10% Completed
  • 33% Needs Review
  • 10% In Progress
  • 47% Not Started
Briefs are written legal documents presented to a court arguing why one party to a case should prevail over the other. This subsection of “Briefs” includes a broad range of issues related to church administration, such as the jurisdiction of civil courts over ecclesiastical matters and the jurisdiction of the church over civil matters, clerical appointments and associated benefits and privileges, as well as disciplinary issues such as the excommunication of members and ecclesiastical immunity from criminal charges.

Expedientes jurídicos: Leyes eclesiásticas, jurisdicción y privilegio

Los expedientes jurídicos son documentos legales redactados y llevados ante un tribunal para presentar querellas y argüir por qué una de las partes de un caso debe prevalecer sobre la otra. Esta subsección de “expedientes jurídicos” incluye una amplia gama de asuntos relacionados al alcance de la administración de la iglesia como la jurisdicción de los tribunales civiles sobre asuntos eclesiásticos y la jurisdicción de la iglesia sobre asuntos civiles, convocatoria de clérigos y los beneficios y privilegios asociados. También incluye cuestiones disciplinarias como la excomunión de miembros y la inmunidad eclesiástica por cargos criminales.

Filter pages:

All Completed (324) Needs Review (1,082) In Progress (339) Not Started (1,528)
Brief on behalf the Marquis of Priego and the Duke of Cardona versus the Fiscal Prosecutor of the ecclesiastical jurisdiction, concerning jurisdiction rights over the Brotherhood of Nuestra Señora Descolls of the village of Morunys. [February 10, 1723]. [Page 1 of this document is damaged].
Brief on behalf the Marquis of Priego and the Duke of Cardona versus the Fiscal Prosecutor of the ecclesiastical jurisdiction, concerning jurisdiction rights over the Brotherhood of Nuestra Señora Descolls of the village of Morunys. [February 10, 1723]. [Page 1 of this document is damaged].
Brief on behalf the Ecclesiastical Tribunal of the city of Tarragona versus the Military Tribunal of the Princedom of Catalonia, concerning Pedro Bourges, Jaime Morian and Claudio Pilo, all of them Grenadiers of the Regiment of the Royal Guards of Valona to the effect that the ecclesiastical community is not subject to the military jurisdiction. [October 27, 1724].
Brief on behalf the Ecclesiastical Tribunal of the city of Tarragona versus the Military Tribunal of the Princedom of Catalonia, concerning Pedro Bourges, Jaime Morian and Claudio Pilo, all of them Grenadiers of the Regiment of the Royal Guards of Valona to the effect that the ecclesiastical community is not subject to the military jurisdiction. [October 27, 1724].
Brief on behalf the Fiscal Prosecutor, the ecclesiastical Tribunal of the city of Girona and the community of priests of the Parish Church of San Estevan of the village of Olot versus the Magistrates and the Municipal Government of said village of Olot, concerning plaintiff's rights to engage in the business of trading on meat. [August 2, 1725].
Brief on behalf the Fiscal Prosecutor, the ecclesiastical Tribunal of the city of Girona and the community of priests of the Parish Church of San Estevan of the village of Olot versus the Magistrates and the Municipal Government of said village of Olot, concerning plaintiff's rights to engage in the business of trading on meat. [August 2, 1725].
Brief on behalf José Mariconda, Governor of the city of Alcudia versus Juan Fernández Zapata, Bishop of the Kingdom of Mallorca, concerning offenses to the person of the Bishop of Mallorca while visiting the city of Alcudia. [March 16, 1725].
Brief on behalf José Mariconda, Governor of the city of Alcudia versus Juan Fernández Zapata, Bishop of the Kingdom of Mallorca, concerning offenses to the person of the Bishop of Mallorca while visiting the city of Alcudia. [March 16, 1725].
Brief on behalf Juan Fernández Zapata, Bishop of the Kingdom of Mallorca versus José Mariconda, Governor of the city of Alcudia, concerning offenses to the person of the Bishop of Mallorca while visiting the city of Alcudia. [March 12, 1725].
Brief on behalf Juan Fernández Zapata, Bishop of the Kingdom of Mallorca versus José Mariconda, Governor of the city of Alcudia, concerning offenses to the person of the Bishop of Mallorca while visiting the city of Alcudia. [March 12, 1725].
Brief on behalf the Imperial Monastery of Saint Cugat of the religious order of Saint Benito, concerning the expulsion of an unnamed friar by said monastery. [Ca. 1725].
Brief on behalf the Imperial Monastery of Saint Cugat of the religious order of Saint Benito, concerning the expulsion of an unnamed friar by said monastery. [Ca. 1725].
Brief on behalf Simón de Guinda Apeztegui, the ecclesiastical Prince of the Valley of Andorra versus the General Assembly and the Military Order of Saint Juan Gerónimo, concerning jurisdictional rights over the villages of Rialp and Vilamur. [April 26, 1725].
Brief on behalf Simón de Guinda Apeztegui, the ecclesiastical Prince of the Valley of Andorra versus the General Assembly and the Military Order of Saint Juan Gerónimo, concerning jurisdictional rights over the villages of Rialp and Vilamur. [April 26, 1725].
Brief on behalf Domingo Martínez, the Rector of the Parish Church of the village of Corbera of the Diocese of Tortosa and the Fiscal Procurator of that ecclesiastical jurisdiction, versus the Fiscal Prosecutor and Syndic of the village of Corbera, concerning plaintiff's privileges in said Parish Church of the village of Corbera. [March 24, 1727].
Brief on behalf Domingo Martínez, the Rector of the Parish Church of the village of Corbera of the Diocese of Tortosa and the Fiscal Procurator of that ecclesiastical jurisdiction, versus the Fiscal Prosecutor and Syndic of the village of Corbera, concerning plaintiff's privileges in said Parish Church of the village of Corbera. [March 24, 1727].
Brief on behalf Felipe de Vilaplana Traguany, an attorney-at-law of the village of Pons, versus the Bishop of the town of La Seo de Urgell, concerning plaintiff's excommunication on a dispute over an appointment to the post of Canon of the church of said village of Pons. [December 31, 1727].
Brief on behalf Felipe de Vilaplana Traguany, an attorney-at-law of the village of Pons, versus the Bishop of the town of La Seo de Urgell, concerning plaintiff's excommunication on a dispute over an appointment to the post of Canon of the church of said village of Pons. [December 31, 1727].
Additional brief on behalf Felipe de Vilaplana, an attorney-at-law, of the village of Pons versus Andrés Apestegui, a canon of the Holy Church of Urgell and Simón de Guinda Apeztegui, Bishop of Urgell and Prince of the Valley of Andorra, concerning plaintiff's excommunication on a dispute over an appointment to the post of canon of the said church of the village of Pons. [July 28, 1728].
Additional brief on behalf Felipe de Vilaplana, an attorney-at-law, of the village of Pons versus Andrés Apestegui, a canon of the Holy Church of Urgell and Simón de Guinda Apeztegui, Bishop of Urgell and Prince of the Valley of Andorra, concerning plaintiff's excommunication on a dispute over an appointment to the post of canon of the said church of the village of Pons. [July 28, 1728].