Briefs: Ecclesiastical Law, Jurisdiction and Privilege

  • 10% Completed
  • 32% Needs Review
  • 10% In Progress
  • 49% Not Started
Briefs are written legal documents presented to a court arguing why one party to a case should prevail over the other. This subsection of “Briefs” includes a broad range of issues related to church administration, such as the jurisdiction of civil courts over ecclesiastical matters and the jurisdiction of the church over civil matters, clerical appointments and associated benefits and privileges, as well as disciplinary issues such as the excommunication of members and ecclesiastical immunity from criminal charges.

Expedientes jurídicos: Leyes eclesiásticas, jurisdicción y privilegio

Los expedientes jurídicos son documentos legales redactados y llevados ante un tribunal para presentar querellas y argüir por qué una de las partes de un caso debe prevalecer sobre la otra. Esta subsección de “expedientes jurídicos” incluye una amplia gama de asuntos relacionados al alcance de la administración de la iglesia como la jurisdicción de los tribunales civiles sobre asuntos eclesiásticos y la jurisdicción de la iglesia sobre asuntos civiles, convocatoria de clérigos y los beneficios y privilegios asociados. También incluye cuestiones disciplinarias como la excomunión de miembros y la inmunidad eclesiástica por cargos criminales.

Filter pages:

All Completed (319) Needs Review (1,045) In Progress (319) Not Started (1,590)
Additional brief on behalf Felipe Vilaplana Traguany, an attorney-at-law of the village of Pons, versus the ecclesiastical authorities of the village of Urgell, concerning plaintiff's excommunication on a dispute over the appointment of a canon to the church of the village of Pons. [December 31, 1728].
Additional brief on behalf Felipe Vilaplana Traguany, an attorney-at-law of the village of Pons, versus the ecclesiastical authorities of the village of Urgell, concerning plaintiff's excommunication on a dispute over the appointment of a canon to the church of the village of Pons. [December 31, 1728].
Brief on behalf the Municipal Government of the city of Urgell versus the Rector and Chapter of Canons of the Holy Church of said city of Urgell, concerning defendant's rights to own and manage the meat market. [June 23, 1730].
Brief on behalf the Municipal Government of the city of Urgell versus the Rector and Chapter of Canons of the Holy Church of said city of Urgell, concerning defendant's rights to own and manage the meat market. [June 23, 1730].
Brief on behalf the Chapter of Canons of the Holy Church of the city of Urgell versus the Municipal Government of said city, concerning plaintiff's rights to trade and manage its own meat market. [Ca. 1730].
Brief on behalf the Chapter of Canons of the Holy Church of the city of Urgell versus the Municipal Government of said city, concerning plaintiff's rights to trade and manage its own meat market. [Ca. 1730].
Brief on behalf the Tribunal of the Royal Audience of the Princedom of Catalonia versus the Fiscal Procurator of the Diocese of Solsona and the Chapter of Canons of the Church of said village of Solsona, concerning said Chapter of Canon's jurisdiction over certain religious matters. [May 25, 1730].
Brief on behalf the Tribunal of the Royal Audience of the Princedom of Catalonia versus the Fiscal Procurator of the Diocese of Solsona and the Chapter of Canons of the Church of said village of Solsona, concerning said Chapter of Canon's jurisdiction over certain religious matters. [May 25, 1730].
Brief on behalf José de Aramburu, Brigadier of the Royal Army and Commander of the Royal Guards of Spain, versus the Fiscal Prosecutor of the Ecclesiastical Tribunal and José Lozano, concerning said José Lozano's ecclesiastical immunity for assault and battery on the person of Juan Paragullano, major drummer of the Royal Guards of Spain. [September 25, 1729].
Brief on behalf José de Aramburu, Brigadier of the Royal Army and Commander of the Royal Guards of Spain, versus the Fiscal Prosecutor of the Ecclesiastical Tribunal and José Lozano, concerning said José Lozano's ecclesiastical immunity for assault and battery on the person of Juan Paragullano, major drummer of the Royal Guards of Spain. [September 25, 1729].
Brief on behalf José de Aramburu, Brigadier of the Royal Army of his Majesty and Commander of the Royal Guards of Spain, versus the Ecclesiastical Fiscal of the Tribunal of the city of Tarragona and Diego Fuentes, a soldier of the Royal Guards of Spain, concerning said Diego Fuentes' ecclesiastical immunity for assault and battery on the person of Blas Iglesias. [November 8, 1729].
Brief on behalf José de Aramburu, Brigadier of the Royal Army of his Majesty and Commander of the Royal Guards of Spain, versus the Ecclesiastical Fiscal of the Tribunal of the city of Tarragona and Diego Fuentes, a soldier of the Royal Guards of Spain, concerning said Diego Fuentes' ecclesiastical immunity for assault and battery on the person of Blas Iglesias. [November 8, 1729].
Brief on behalf José de Aramburu, Commander of the Royal Army of the Guards of Spain, versus the Fiscal Procurator of the Ecclesiastical Tribunal of the city of Manresa and José Fuentes and Francisco Carrillo, soldiers of said Regiment of Guards of Spain, concerning defendant's ecclesiastical immunity for the assault and battery on the person of Antonio Bernardi. [June 25, 1729].
Brief on behalf José de Aramburu, Commander of the Royal Army of the Guards of Spain, versus the Fiscal Procurator of the Ecclesiastical Tribunal of the city of Manresa and José Fuentes and Francisco Carrillo, soldiers of said Regiment of Guards of Spain, concerning defendant's ecclesiastical immunity for the assault and battery on the person of Antonio Bernardi. [June 25, 1729].
Brief on behalf José Fuentes and Francisco Carrillo of the Royal Regiment of Guards of Spain of the company of Jorge Pacheco versus the Fiscal Procurator of the Audience of the Princedom of Catalonia, concerning plaintiff's ecclesiastical immunity for assault and battery on the person of Antonio Berandi. [July 16, 1729].
Brief on behalf José Fuentes and Francisco Carrillo of the Royal Regiment of Guards of Spain of the company of Jorge Pacheco versus the Fiscal Procurator of the Audience of the Princedom of Catalonia, concerning plaintiff's ecclesiastical immunity for assault and battery on the person of Antonio Berandi. [July 16, 1729].
Brief on behalf José Gasch versus Rafael de Xeza, a priest of the Church of Santa María of the village of Puigcerdá, concerning defendant's right to support. [May 10, 1729].
Brief on behalf José Gasch versus Rafael de Xeza, a priest of the Church of Santa María of the village of Puigcerdá, concerning defendant's right to support. [May 10, 1729].
Brief on behalf the Chapter of the Holy Cathedral Church of Vich versus the village and the community of the village of San Feliu de Torelló, concerning jurisdictional rights over the parish church of the village of San Feliu de Torelló. [December 20, 1727].
Brief on behalf the Chapter of the Holy Cathedral Church of Vich versus the village and the community of the village of San Feliu de Torelló, concerning jurisdictional rights over the parish church of the village of San Feliu de Torelló. [December 20, 1727].