Opinions & Judgments: Royal and regional rulings

“Opinions and Judgments” is one of the six original categories of the Spanish Legal documents collection. These include decisions rendered by the king’s courts, opinions by the attorneys of the king, as well as local courts’ judgments concerning a variety of cases and subjects. Most prominent are inheritance and estate, dowry, and titles of nobility cases.

Opiniones y juicios: fallos reales y regionales

“Opiniones y juicios” es una de las seis categorías originales de la colección de documentos jurídicos españoles. Ésta incluye decisiones reproducidas por las audiencias del rey, opiniones por abogados del rey y juicios de tribunales locales relativo a varios casos y temáticas. Lo más destacado son las herencias y la heredad, dotes y títulos de casos nobiliarios.

All Not Started In Progress Needs Review Completed
134 contributors
Completed 99
Needs Review 729
In Progress 0
Not Started 0
Ecclesiastical Judgment for Friar Francisco Llussa of the Church of Santa María del Pino of the city of Barcelona issued by Baltasar de Bastero Lledó, a priest, Dean and Canon of the Holy Cathedral Church of the city of Barcelona affirming Friar Llussa pension for his duties as a canon of the said church of Santa María del Pino.
Ecclesiastical Judgment for Friar Francisco Llussa of the Church of Santa María del Pino of the city of Barcelona issued by Baltasar de Bastero Lledó, a priest, Dean and Canon of the Holy Cathedral Church of the city of Barcelona affirming Friar Llussa pension for his duties as a canon of the said church of Santa María del Pino.
Royal Judgment of August 27, 1734 issued by Francisco de Borrás Viñals on behalf of Antonio Mañer of the city of Tarragona in the case against Pablo Boffarull, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of the spouses Rafael and Tecla Guasch.
Royal Judgment of August 27, 1734 issued by Francisco de Borrás Viñals on behalf of Antonio Mañer of the city of Tarragona in the case against Pablo Boffarull, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of the spouses Rafael and Tecla Guasch.
Royal Judgment of January 27, 1708 issued by Salvador Balrich on behalf of Margarita Pou Trobat, a widow, in the case against Francisco Tomás Trobat, as the father and administrator of his children, Narciso, Mariana and Ana María, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Sebastián Trobat.
Royal Judgment of January 27, 1708 issued by Salvador Balrich on behalf of Margarita Pou Trobat, a widow, in the case against Francisco Tomás Trobat, as the father and administrator of his children, Narciso, Mariana and Ana María, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Sebastián Trobat.
Judgment of January 8, 1712 issued by José Romaguera on behalf Agustín Rovira, a priest, in the case against José Despujol de Pons, also a priest, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Gisperto de Guimerá Despapiol.
Judgment of January 8, 1712 issued by José Romaguera on behalf Agustín Rovira, a priest, in the case against José Despujol de Pons, also a priest, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Gisperto de Guimerá Despapiol.
Judgment of April 6, 1713 issued by José Rifós on behalf Gabriel Martí, a priest, in the case against Agustín Prieto, José Martí and José Miró, who are also priests, concerning certain ecclesiastical privileges.
Judgment of April 6, 1713 issued by José Rifós on behalf Gabriel Martí, a priest, in the case against Agustín Prieto, José Martí and José Miró, who are also priests, concerning certain ecclesiastical privileges.
Legal opinion on behalf the Count of Aranda concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed with his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [February 24, 1647].
Legal opinion on behalf the Count of Aranda concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed with his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [February 24, 1647].
Legal opinion by Agustín de Barbosa, a Notary Public, and other attorneys of Madrid, concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed between the Count of Aranda and his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [March 22, 1647].
Legal opinion by Agustín de Barbosa, a Notary Public, and other attorneys of Madrid, concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed between the Count of Aranda and his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [March 22, 1647].
Legal opinion by Arcediano de Zaragoza and the Archprelate of Daroca, concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed between the Count of Aranda and his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [April 5, 1647].
Legal opinion by Arcediano de Zaragoza and the Archprelate of Daroca, concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed between the Count of Aranda and his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [April 5, 1647].
Legal opinion by the Canons of the Metropolitan City of Zaragoza, concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed between the Count of Aranda and his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [April 9, 1647].
Legal opinion by the Canons of the Metropolitan City of Zaragoza, concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed between the Count of Aranda and his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [April 9, 1647].
Legal opinion by some Fathers of the religious order of Santo Domingo, concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed between the Count of Aranda and his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [April 11, 1647].
Legal opinion by some Fathers of the religious order of Santo Domingo, concerning dowry clause in the articles of marriage executed between the Count of Aranda and his deceased wife, the Countess Luisa Manrique y Padilla. [April 11, 1647].