Opinions & Judgments: Royal and regional rulings

48% Completed
52% Needs Review

“Opinions and Judgments” is one of the six original categories of the Spanish Legal documents collection. These include decisions rendered by the king’s courts, opinions by the attorneys of the king, as well as local courts’ judgments concerning a variety of cases and subjects. Most prominent are inheritance and estate, dowry, and titles of nobility cases.

Opiniones y juicios: fallos reales y regionales

“Opiniones y juicios” es una de las seis categorías originales de la colección de documentos jurídicos españoles. Ésta incluye decisiones reproducidas por las audiencias del rey, opiniones por abogados del rey y juicios de tribunales locales relativo a varios casos y temáticas. Lo más destacado son las herencias y la heredad, dotes y títulos de casos nobiliarios.

Filter pages:

All Completed (389) Needs Review (427) In Progress (0) Not Started (0)

Ecclesiastical Judgment of September 6, 1694 issued by Antonio Bonamices ordering the Chapter of Canons of the Cathedral Church of Dertusa to support the Bishop and other dignitaries of said Cathedral Church of Dertusa.

Ecclesiastical Judgment of September 6, 1694 issued by Antonio Bonamices ordering the Chapter of Canons of the Cathedral Church of Dertusa to support the Bishop and other dignitaries of said Cathedral Church of Dertusa.

Royal Judgment of July 4, 1702 issued by José de Pastor Mora on behalf of the spouses Raimundo and María Albert Camps of the village of Olot in the case against Esteban and María Fontanella Dou of the same village concerning revocation of a gift executed by Francisco Camps on behalf of his daughter María.

Royal Judgment of July 4, 1702 issued by José de Pastor Mora on behalf of the spouses Raimundo and María Albert Camps of the village of Olot in the case against Esteban and María Fontanella Dou of the same village concerning revocation of a gift executed by Francisco Camps on behalf of his daughter María.

Royal Judgment of October 11, 1702 on behalf Jacobo Rovira Cañellas, a farmer of the village of Tayá versus Juan Rovira Juvenen of the city of Barcelona, concerning certain religious privileges.

Royal Judgment of October 11, 1702 on behalf Jacobo Rovira Cañellas, a farmer of the village of Tayá versus Juan Rovira Juvenen of the city of Barcelona, concerning certain religious privileges.

Royal Judgment of June 18, 1701 issued by Francisco de Verzamón on behalf of Francisco de Perelló, the Syndic and the community of the village of Foliola in the case against Francisco de Carmona Borrás of the village of Martorell, concerning the sale of certain real estate.

Royal Judgment of June 18, 1701 issued by Francisco de Verzamón on behalf of Francisco de Perelló, the Syndic and the community of the village of Foliola in the case against Francisco de Carmona Borrás of the village of Martorell, concerning the sale of certain real estate.

Royal judgment of March 14, 1692 for Ana de Riber Major, issued by José de Pastor Mora in the case of the legal guardians of Teresa de Riber Gualbes against Ana de Riber Major, the widow of Miguel de Riber, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of said Miguel de Riber.

Royal judgment of March 14, 1692 for Ana de Riber Major, issued by José de Pastor Mora in the case of the legal guardians of Teresa de Riber Gualbes against Ana de Riber Major, the widow of Miguel de Riber, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of said Miguel de Riber.

Royal Judgment of August 8, 1701 issued by Buenaventura Tristany Bofill on behalf of Francisco de Carmona Borrás of the village of Martorell in the case against Francisco de Perelló and the Syndic and the community of the village of Foliola for the sale of certain real estate.

Royal Judgment of August 8, 1701 issued by Buenaventura Tristany Bofill on behalf of Francisco de Carmona Borrás of the village of Martorell in the case against Francisco de Perelló and the Syndic and the community of the village of Foliola for the sale of certain real estate.

Royal Judgment of July 9, 1700 issued by José Pastor Mora on behalf of Bartolomé Morató Ferrer of the village of Olot in the case against the spouses María and Francisco Masberant Not for restitution of María Masbernat's dowry.

Royal Judgment of July 9, 1700 issued by José Pastor Mora on behalf of Bartolomé Morató Ferrer of the village of Olot in the case against the spouses María and Francisco Masberant Not for restitution of María Masbernat's dowry.

Judgment of August 30, 1729 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of Felipe de Vilaplana Treguany in the case against the Fiscal Procurator of the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, concerning jurisdictional rights to appoint a canon to the parish church of the village of Pons.

Judgment of August 30, 1729 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of Felipe de Vilaplana Treguany in the case against the Fiscal Procurator of the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, concerning jurisdictional rights to appoint a canon to the parish church of the village of Pons.

Royal Judgment of September 27, 1700 issued by Cristóbal de Potau on behalf of the Syndic and the community of the village of Llansá in the case against Pedro Antonio Guanter, a farmer of the parish of San Silvestre who is ordered to pay certain amount of money for the support of said Syndic and village of Llansá.

Royal Judgment of September 27, 1700 issued by Cristóbal de Potau on behalf of the Syndic and the community of the village of Llansá in the case against Pedro Antonio Guanter, a farmer of the parish of San Silvestre who is ordered to pay certain amount of money for the support of said Syndic and village of Llansá.

Royal Judgment of April 9, 1699 for José de Ascón Mendoza, a knight of the Order of Calatrava, issued by Francisco de Rius in the case against Francisco de Palau Torralla, concerning support rights.

Royal Judgment of April 9, 1699 for José de Ascón Mendoza, a knight of the Order of Calatrava, issued by Francisco de Rius in the case against Francisco de Palau Torralla, concerning support rights.