Opinions & Judgments: Royal and regional rulings

  • 40% Completed
  • 60% Needs Review
“Opinions and Judgments” is one of the six original categories of the Spanish Legal documents collection. These include decisions rendered by the king’s courts, opinions by the attorneys of the king, as well as local courts’ judgments concerning a variety of cases and subjects. Most prominent are inheritance and estate, dowry, and titles of nobility cases.

Opiniones y juicios: fallos reales y regionales

“Opiniones y juicios” es una de las seis categorías originales de la colección de documentos jurídicos españoles. Ésta incluye decisiones reproducidas por las audiencias del rey, opiniones por abogados del rey y juicios de tribunales locales relativo a varios casos y temáticas. Lo más destacado son las herencias y la heredad, dotes y títulos de casos nobiliarios.

Filter pages:

All Completed (325) Needs Review (491) In Progress (0) Not Started (0)
Royal Judgment of June 5, 1748 issued by Ignacio de Rius on behalf of Francisco Desvilar Desprat in the case against Gerónimo de Ferrer y de Llupiá, Fiscal Procurator of the district of Tavertet, concerning title to the real estate property known as "Manso Vilar".
Royal Judgment of June 5, 1748 issued by Ignacio de Rius on behalf of Francisco Desvilar Desprat in the case against Gerónimo de Ferrer y de Llupiá, Fiscal Procurator of the district of Tavertet, concerning title to the real estate property known as "Manso Vilar".
Complete
Royal Judgment of January 29, 1740 issued by Ignacio de Rius on behalf of Francisco Desvilar Desprat in the case against Gerónimo de Ferrer y de Llupiá, Fiscal Prosecutor of the district of Tavertet, concerning Francisco Desvilar Desprat's nobility rights and title to the real estate property known as "Manso Vilar".
Royal Judgment of January 29, 1740 issued by Ignacio de Rius on behalf of Francisco Desvilar Desprat in the case against Gerónimo de Ferrer y de Llupiá, Fiscal Prosecutor of the district of Tavertet, concerning Francisco Desvilar Desprat's nobility rights and title to the real estate property known as "Manso Vilar".
Complete
Judgment of February 26, 1727 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of the Ecclesiastical Tribunal of the city of Girona, Francisco de Pastor Descallar, Abbot of the Royal Monastery of San Pedro de Besalú and the community of priests of said Monastery, in the case against the Royal Audiencia of said village of San Pedro de Besalú, concerning the excommunication of Miguel Plantés.
Judgment of February 26, 1727 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of the Ecclesiastical Tribunal of the city of Girona, Francisco de Pastor Descallar, Abbot of the Royal Monastery of San Pedro de Besalú and the community of priests of said Monastery, in the case against the Royal Audiencia of said village of San Pedro de Besalú, concerning the excommunication of Miguel Plantés.
Complete
Judgment issued by Ignacio de Rius on behalf of Rafael de Xeza, a priest of the Church of Santa María of the village of Puigcerdá and a member of the Holy Inquisition, in the case against José Gasch of said village of Puigcerdá, concerning right to support. [Ca.1729].
Judgment issued by Ignacio de Rius on behalf of Rafael de Xeza, a priest of the Church of Santa María of the village of Puigcerdá and a member of the Holy Inquisition, in the case against José Gasch of said village of Puigcerdá, concerning right to support. [Ca.1729].
Royal Judgment of December 18, 1730 issued by Francisco de Borrás Viñals on behalf José de Solís Gante, Duke of Montellano, as father and legal representative of Alfonso Vicente de Solís Gante Folch de Cardona, Count of Saldueña and Marquis of Castelnovo .
Royal Judgment of December 18, 1730 issued by Francisco de Borrás Viñals on behalf José de Solís Gante, Duke of Montellano, as father and legal representative of Alfonso Vicente de Solís Gante Folch de Cardona, Count of Saldueña and Marquis of Castelnovo .
Royal Judgment of February 13, 1731 issued by Francisco Borrás Viñals on behalf of Francisco Puig Torbegur Portás in the case against Francisca Reyroli, a widow, and others, concerning a monetary debt.
Royal Judgment of February 13, 1731 issued by Francisco Borrás Viñals on behalf of Francisco Puig Torbegur Portás in the case against Francisca Reyroli, a widow, and others, concerning a monetary debt.
Judgment of August 1, 1703 issued by Feliciano de Cordellas on behalf of the General Syndic of the Princedom of Catalonia, in the case against the General Lieutenancy of the Princedom of Catalonia for misappropriation of funds.
Judgment of August 1, 1703 issued by Feliciano de Cordellas on behalf of the General Syndic of the Princedom of Catalonia, in the case against the General Lieutenancy of the Princedom of Catalonia for misappropriation of funds.
Judgment of August 1, 1703 issued by Miguel de Calderó on behalf of the clerks of the Lieutenancy of Catalonia for charges filed against them by the General Syndic of the Princedom of Catalonia for abuse of power.
Judgment of August 1, 1703 issued by Miguel de Calderó on behalf of the clerks of the Lieutenancy of Catalonia for charges filed against them by the General Syndic of the Princedom of Catalonia for abuse of power.
Sentence of October 21, 1726 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of Isidro Vidal in the case against the Fiscal Prosecutor of the Criminal Audience, concerning annulment of said Isidro Vidal's baptism.
Sentence of October 21, 1726 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of Isidro Vidal in the case against the Fiscal Prosecutor of the Criminal Audience, concerning annulment of said Isidro Vidal's baptism.
Judgment issued by Miguel de Calderó on behalf of the clerks of the Lieutenancy General of the Princedom of Catalonia, Francisco Delfau, Estebán Galcerán, Juan de Morer Pascual, Juan Bautista de Aloy and Ramón Pellicer, in the case against the General Syndic of the Princedom of Catalonia for alleged abuse of power by said clerks. [Ca. 1703]
Judgment issued by Miguel de Calderó on behalf of the clerks of the Lieutenancy General of the Princedom of Catalonia, Francisco Delfau, Estebán Galcerán, Juan de Morer Pascual, Juan Bautista de Aloy and Ramón Pellicer, in the case against the General Syndic of the Princedom of Catalonia for alleged abuse of power by said clerks. [Ca. 1703]