Opinions & Judgments: Royal and regional rulings

  • 40% Completed
  • 60% Needs Review
“Opinions and Judgments” is one of the six original categories of the Spanish Legal documents collection. These include decisions rendered by the king’s courts, opinions by the attorneys of the king, as well as local courts’ judgments concerning a variety of cases and subjects. Most prominent are inheritance and estate, dowry, and titles of nobility cases.

Opiniones y juicios: fallos reales y regionales

“Opiniones y juicios” es una de las seis categorías originales de la colección de documentos jurídicos españoles. Ésta incluye decisiones reproducidas por las audiencias del rey, opiniones por abogados del rey y juicios de tribunales locales relativo a varios casos y temáticas. Lo más destacado son las herencias y la heredad, dotes y títulos de casos nobiliarios.

Filter pages:

All Completed (325) Needs Review (491) In Progress (0) Not Started (0)
Royal Judgment of May 17, 1730 issued by Francisco Bach on behalf of Juan Chantal, Administrator of the Funds of the Royal Regiment of Walloom Guards, versus Enrique de Zifredi, Field-Marshal of the Royal Army, concerning payment of certain monetary debt.
Royal Judgment of May 17, 1730 issued by Francisco Bach on behalf of Juan Chantal, Administrator of the Funds of the Royal Regiment of Walloom Guards, versus Enrique de Zifredi, Field-Marshal of the Royal Army, concerning payment of certain monetary debt.
Royal Judgment of March 17, 1731 issued by Ignacio de Rius on behalf of Isabel de Rossi y de Sayol, Marchioness of Monferrato, in the case against Jacinta de Gillón Sayol, formerly known as Jacinta de Bouvechrich, Baroness of Mus, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Francisco de Sayol Quartenori.
Royal Judgment of March 17, 1731 issued by Ignacio de Rius on behalf of Isabel de Rossi y de Sayol, Marchioness of Monferrato, in the case against Jacinta de Gillón Sayol, formerly known as Jacinta de Bouvechrich, Baroness of Mus, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Francisco de Sayol Quartenori.
Judgment of July 31, 1725 issued by Jacobo de Cortada Bru on behalf of Raimundo Romá in the case against Ildefonso Montesinos, Pablo Verges, Pablo Masferrer, priests, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Jacobo Ollar, also a priest.
Judgment of July 31, 1725 issued by Jacobo de Cortada Bru on behalf of Raimundo Romá in the case against Ildefonso Montesinos, Pablo Verges, Pablo Masferrer, priests, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Jacobo Ollar, also a priest.
Royal Judgment of December 1, 1725 issued by Manuel de Toledo on behalf of the Abbot of the Monastery of San Feliu de Guixols in the case against the Fiscal Prosecutor of said village of San Feliu de Guixols, concerning jurisdictional rights over said village of San Feliu de Guixols.
Royal Judgment of December 1, 1725 issued by Manuel de Toledo on behalf of the Abbot of the Monastery of San Feliu de Guixols in the case against the Fiscal Prosecutor of said village of San Feliu de Guixols, concerning jurisdictional rights over said village of San Feliu de Guixols.
Royal Judgment of February 17, 1725 issued by Leonardo Gutiérrez on behalf of Raimundo Pausa in the case against Pedro Jaquet Sartor, concerning payment of certain monetary debt.
Royal Judgment of February 17, 1725 issued by Leonardo Gutiérrez on behalf of Raimundo Pausa in the case against Pedro Jaquet Sartor, concerning payment of certain monetary debt.
Royal Judgment of May 23, 1726 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of the Tribunal of the Royal Audience and Members of the village of Olot in the case against the Ecclesiastical Tribunal, the Bishopric of Girona and the community of priests of the village of Olot, concerning said ecclesiastical community's rights to trade in meat.
Royal Judgment of May 23, 1726 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of the Tribunal of the Royal Audience and Members of the village of Olot in the case against the Ecclesiastical Tribunal, the Bishopric of Girona and the community of priests of the village of Olot, concerning said ecclesiastical community's rights to trade in meat.
Royal Judgment of July 18, 1725 issued by Manuel de Toledo on behalf of Pedro Lacosta in the case against José Turet, concerning payment of certain monetary debt.
Royal Judgment of July 18, 1725 issued by Manuel de Toledo on behalf of Pedro Lacosta in the case against José Turet, concerning payment of certain monetary debt.
Judgment of September 20, 1723 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of the Marquis of Priego and Duke of Medinaceli and Cardona and the Fiscal Prosecutor in the case against the Ecclesiastical Tribunal, concerning the ecclesiastical authorities' rights to visit the parish church of San Lorenzo de Morunys which is subject to the jurisdiction of said Marquis of Priego. [Damaged document].
Judgment of September 20, 1723 issued by Félix de Vilaplana on behalf of the Marquis of Priego and Duke of Medinaceli and Cardona and the Fiscal Prosecutor in the case against the Ecclesiastical Tribunal, concerning the ecclesiastical authorities' rights to visit the parish church of San Lorenzo de Morunys which is subject to the jurisdiction of said Marquis of Priego. [Damaged document].
Royal Judgment of May 13, 1723 issued by Manuel de Toledo on behalf of Antonio de Pastors and others in the case against Ana Vives Olmera, the widow of Juan Vives Vedruna and others, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Caterina de Pastors, formerly Caterina Vives.
Royal Judgment of May 13, 1723 issued by Manuel de Toledo on behalf of Antonio de Pastors and others in the case against Ana Vives Olmera, the widow of Juan Vives Vedruna and others, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Caterina de Pastors, formerly Caterina Vives.
Royal Judgment of July 6, 1702 issued by José Moret on behalf of Juan Fabrega, a farmer of the parish of San Esteban of the village of Olot in the case against several leaseholders for the payment of certain rents.
Royal Judgment of July 6, 1702 issued by José Moret on behalf of Juan Fabrega, a farmer of the parish of San Esteban of the village of Olot in the case against several leaseholders for the payment of certain rents.