Rescanned Documents

  • 37% Completed
  • 52% Needs Review
  • 10% In Progress
This category contains a cross-section of documents from the Herencia collection that were previously withheld from the campaign due to legibility issues with the digitized microfilm. Unlike the other categories, the items displayed here have been recently digitized from the original paper documents rather than from their microfilm versions. Most documents in this category are taken from the “Briefs” and “Laws and Statutes” subsections, but documents from “Canon Law,” “Notarial Instruments,” “Opinions and Judgments,” and “Miscellaneous” are also included.

Documentos Re-escaneados

Esta categoría contiene una serie de documentos de nuestra colección Herencia previamente no publicados por falta de legibilidad (inicialmente éstos habían sido digitalizados del microfilm). A diferencia de las otras categorías, este material ha sido escaneado directamente de los manuscritos originales y no de sus versiones microfilmadas. La mayoría de documentos en esta categoría provienen de las subsecciones “Expedientes jurídicos” y “Leyes y estatutos,” aunque también incluyen documentos de las categorías “Derecho canónico,” “Instrumentos notariales,” “Opiniones y juicios,” y “Miscelánea.”

Filter pages:

All Completed (485) Needs Review (680) In Progress (133) Not Started (0)
Brief on behalf María Josefa de Berenguer versus Antonio de Valentia, concerning criminal charges against the latter for the alleged theft of the goods belonging to the estate of José Regás. [December 28, 1703].
Brief on behalf María Josefa de Berenguer versus Antonio de Valentia, concerning criminal charges against the latter for the alleged theft of the goods belonging to the estate of José Regás. [December 28, 1703].
Brief on behalf María de Lapeira y de Cardona, a widow, and others, as the legal guardians of the ward, Teresa de Martí Lapeira, versus Teresa Betrela de Lapeira, concerning said Teresa de Martí Lapeira's education. [January 20, 1723].
Brief on behalf María de Lapeira y de Cardona, a widow, and others, as the legal guardians of the ward, Teresa de Martí Lapeira, versus Teresa Betrela de Lapeira, concerning said Teresa de Martí Lapeira's education. [January 20, 1723].
Brief on behalf the Abbot of the Monastery of the village of San Feliu de Guixols versus the Fiscal Procurator and the Syndic of said village of San Feliu de Guixols, concerning plaintiff's rights and privileges over said monastery of the village of San Feliu de Guixols. [Contains a list of privileges claimed by said Abbot of the Monastery of the village of San Feliu de Guixols].
Brief on behalf the Abbot of the Monastery of the village of San Feliu de Guixols versus the Fiscal Procurator and the Syndic of said village of San Feliu de Guixols, concerning plaintiff's rights and privileges over said monastery of the village of San Feliu de Guixols. [Contains a list of privileges claimed by said Abbot of the Monastery of the village of San Feliu de Guixols].
Brief on behalf Juan Luis de Moncada Rufo, Duke of San Juan, of Bibona and of Montalto, versus Pascual Benito de Belvis Moncada, Marquis of Belgida, of Vilamayor and of Benavides and Pedro de Alcantara Fernández de Cordova y la Cerda, Marquis of Aytona and of Cogolludo, concerning title to the Marquisate of Aytona and all other real estate properties belonging to the estate of Guillén de Moncada. [January 4, 1775]. [Contains family tree of Guillén Ramón de Moncada and of Constanza, princess of Aragón families].
Brief on behalf Juan Luis de Moncada Rufo, Duke of San Juan, of Bibona and of Montalto, versus Pascual Benito de Belvis Moncada, Marquis of Belgida, of Vilamayor and of Benavides and Pedro de Alcantara Fernández de Cordova y la Cerda, Marquis of Aytona and of Cogolludo, concerning title to the Marquisate of Aytona and all other real estate properties belonging to the estate of Guillén de Moncada. [January 4, 1775]. [Contains family tree of Guillén Ramón de Moncada and of Constanza, princess of Aragón families].
Brief on behalf José Pinós y de Pinós, Marquis of Barbará, versus Elena de Lanuza y de Boxados, Marchioness of Dosaguas, concerning payment of certain monetary debt. [August 8, 1780]. [Contains family tree of Juan de Gialbert's family].
Brief on behalf José Pinós y de Pinós, Marquis of Barbará, versus Elena de Lanuza y de Boxados, Marchioness of Dosaguas, concerning payment of certain monetary debt. [August 8, 1780]. [Contains family tree of Juan de Gialbert's family].
Brief on behalf María Josefa de Clariana and her son, Francisco de Paula de Senmenat, Marquis and Marchioness of Senmenat and the Count and Countess of Munter, versus the Count of Aranda and Marquis of Rupit, concerning payment of certain annuity called "Mediona". [April 3, 1789]. [Contains family tree of the following families: de Palou, Torrelles and de Eril].
Brief on behalf María Josefa de Clariana and her son, Francisco de Paula de Senmenat, Marquis and Marchioness of Senmenat and the Count and Countess of Munter, versus the Count of Aranda and Marquis of Rupit, concerning payment of certain annuity called "Mediona". [April 3, 1789]. [Contains family tree of the following families: de Palou, Torrelles and de Eril].
Brief on behalf Pedro Jordán de Urries, Marquis of Ayerbe Lierta Rubi, versus Juan de Suelves y de Montserrat, Marquis of Tamarit, concerning title to the Barony of Altafulla and its district. [October 15, 1807]. [Contains family tree of Pedro de Castellét's family].
Brief on behalf Pedro Jordán de Urries, Marquis of Ayerbe Lierta Rubi, versus Juan de Suelves y de Montserrat, Marquis of Tamarit, concerning title to the Barony of Altafulla and its district. [October 15, 1807]. [Contains family tree of Pedro de Castellét's family].
Brief on behalf José Pascual de Sancliment, formerly known as José de Marimón, versus Juan de Suelves y de Monserrat, Marquis of Tamarit, and Pedro Ignacio de Corbera y de Sancliment, Marquis of Ayerbe, concerning title to the Barony of Altafulla, the real estate property known as "Nou" and the district of Semna. [May 12, 1832]. [Contains family tree of Pedro Ignacio de Corbera y de Sancliment's family].
Brief on behalf José Pascual de Sancliment, formerly known as José de Marimón, versus Juan de Suelves y de Monserrat, Marquis of Tamarit, and Pedro Ignacio de Corbera y de Sancliment, Marquis of Ayerbe, concerning title to the Barony of Altafulla, the real estate property known as "Nou" and the district of Semna. [May 12, 1832]. [Contains family tree of Pedro Ignacio de Corbera y de Sancliment's family].
Brief on behalf Josefa Estañol, the widow of Edualdo Perramón, versus Jacinto Cuyás, concerning payment of certain monetary debt. [March 20, 1861] [Contains a family tree of the parties cited in this case].
Brief on behalf Josefa Estañol, the widow of Edualdo Perramón, versus Jacinto Cuyás, concerning payment of certain monetary debt. [March 20, 1861] [Contains a family tree of the parties cited in this case].
Deed executed in the city of Antequera on February 3, 1572, whereby Garci Ponce de León claims that he is a "Hijodalgo" of the city and therefore should be exempt from payment of the taxes on meat and fish.
Deed executed in the city of Antequera on February 3, 1572, whereby Garci Ponce de León claims that he is a "Hijodalgo" of the city and therefore should be exempt from payment of the taxes on meat and fish.