Rescanned Documents

This category contains a cross-section of documents from the Herencia collection that were previously withheld from the campaign due to legibility issues with the digitized microfilm. Unlike the other categories, the items displayed here have been recently digitized from the original paper documents rather than from their microfilm versions. Most documents in this category are taken from the “Briefs” and “Laws and Statutes” subsections, but documents from “Canon Law,” “Notarial Instruments,” “Opinions and Judgments,” and “Miscellaneous” are also included.

Documentos Re-escaneados

Esta categoría contiene una serie de documentos de nuestra colección Herencia previamente no publicados por falta de legibilidad (inicialmente éstos habían sido digitalizados del microfilm). A diferencia de las otras categorías, este material ha sido escaneado directamente de los manuscritos originales y no de sus versiones microfilmadas. La mayoría de documentos en esta categoría provienen de las subsecciones “Expedientes jurídicos” y “Leyes y estatutos,” aunque también incluyen documentos de las categorías “Derecho canónico,” “Instrumentos notariales,” “Opiniones y juicios,” y “Miscelánea.”
All Not Started In Progress Needs Review Completed
41 registered contributors
Not Started 806
In Progress 18
Needs Review 387
Completed 87
Copy of a court order issued on February 1, 1630, declaring Mariana de Calders heir to the estate of Raimundo [illegible].
Copy of a court order issued on February 1, 1630, declaring Mariana de Calders heir to the estate of Raimundo [illegible].
Brief on behalf Francisco de Sala versus Juan Más, concerning the applicability of the statute of limitations in an action for support.
Brief on behalf Francisco de Sala versus Juan Más, concerning the applicability of the statute of limitations in an action for support.
Brief on behalf María Teresa Gallifa, the widow of Francisco Portavella, their son Pablo and José Gallifa, the legal representative of the heirs of said Francisco Portavella, versus the Chapter of Canons of the Holy Church of Vich, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Francisco Portavella. [June 18, 1789]. [includes family tree of the Vilarasáu-Vilarrasa family]. [includes list of persons with alleged titles to certain real estate property under litigation].
Brief on behalf María Teresa Gallifa, the widow of Francisco Portavella, their son Pablo and José Gallifa, the legal representative of the heirs of said Francisco Portavella, versus the Chapter of Canons of the Holy Church of Vich, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Francisco Portavella. [June 18, 1789]. [includes family tree of the Vilarasáu-Vilarrasa family]. [includes list of persons with alleged titles to certain real estate property under litigation].
Brief on behalf María Josefa de Sabastida, Baroness of Albia, the widow of Carlos Rocabruna de Taberner and Pedro Alcántara de Rocabruna versus Pedro Serra and Juan Oriol, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Luisa de Ardena y de Sabastida. [May 1, 1828].
Brief on behalf María Josefa de Sabastida, Baroness of Albia, the widow of Carlos Rocabruna de Taberner and Pedro Alcántara de Rocabruna versus Pedro Serra and Juan Oriol, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Luisa de Ardena y de Sabastida. [May 1, 1828].
Brief on behalf the spouses Agustín and Cayetana de Copons y de Oms, Marquis and Marchioness of Moya de la Torre and Baron and Baroness of Santa Pau, versus Felix de Oms Santa Pau, Marquis of Castelldorrius, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Antonio de Oms. [April 17, 1728].
Brief on behalf the spouses Agustín and Cayetana de Copons y de Oms, Marquis and Marchioness of Moya de la Torre and Baron and Baroness of Santa Pau, versus Felix de Oms Santa Pau, Marquis of Castelldorrius, concerning certain inheritance rights in the estate of Antonio de Oms. [April 17, 1728].
Brief on behalf Galcerán de Villalonga Zalvá Jalpí versus Félix Raimundo de Ivorra, Baron of San Vicente, concerning a gift executed in the articles of marriage of Jaime and Ana Rosa Zalvá by Jaime Zalvá's parents, Juan O. and Ana Zalvá. [August 11, 1737]. [Contains family tree of the Zalvá family].
Brief on behalf Galcerán de Villalonga Zalvá Jalpí versus Félix Raimundo de Ivorra, Baron of San Vicente, concerning a gift executed in the articles of marriage of Jaime and Ana Rosa Zalvá by Jaime Zalvá's parents, Juan O. and Ana Zalvá. [August 11, 1737]. [Contains family tree of the Zalvá family].
Brief on behalf the Marquis of Ayerbe Lierta Rubi, Grandee of Spain, versus José Pascual de Marimón, Marquis of Serdañola and Count of La Revilla, concerning title to the real estate properties known as Corbera and Sancliment. [February 12, 1817]. [Contains family tree of Reimbaldo de Corbera].
Brief on behalf the Marquis of Ayerbe Lierta Rubi, Grandee of Spain, versus José Pascual de Marimón, Marquis of Serdañola and Count of La Revilla, concerning title to the real estate properties known as Corbera and Sancliment. [February 12, 1817]. [Contains family tree of Reimbaldo de Corbera].
Deed executed in the city of Antequera on February 3, 1572, whereby Garci Ponce de León claims that he is a "Hijodalgo" of the city and therefore should be exempt from payment of the taxes on meat and fish.
Deed executed in the city of Antequera on February 3, 1572, whereby Garci Ponce de León claims that he is a "Hijodalgo" of the city and therefore should be exempt from payment of the taxes on meat and fish.
Order issued by José de Vargas Maldonado, Marquis of La Fresnada, Viscount of Fresno and Governor of the city of Zaragoza, concerning commerce in merchandise and its corresponding taxation. [August 7, 1751].
Order issued by José de Vargas Maldonado, Marquis of La Fresnada, Viscount of Fresno and Governor of the city of Zaragoza, concerning commerce in merchandise and its corresponding taxation. [August 7, 1751].
Royal Order of February 2, 1766 governing judicial proceedings in intestate cases.
Royal Order of February 2, 1766 governing judicial proceedings in intestate cases.